May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031

May 16, 1989 FOMC Record of Policy Actions

Vote

From the minutes

FOMC minutes

of the Committee when its mechanism for initiating consultation exceeded, should be left unchanged at 8 to boundaries are persistently 12 percent. of the meeting, the following domestic policy At the conclusion directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: information reviewed at this meeting suggests The rate of economic growth has slowed in recent that the Gains in total nonfarm payroll employment months. moderated substantially in March and April, and in manufacturing was about unchanged over employment the two months. The civilian unemployment rate rose considerably to 5.3 percent in April. Industrial production increased in April after declining on balance in the preceding two months. Growth in consumer spending has slowed considerably in recent months. Housing starts declined further in April. Recent indicators of business capital spending show a rebound after a decline in the fourth quarter. The nominal U.S. merchandise trade deficit was smaller on average in January and February than in the fourth quarter. Broad measures of prices have risen somewhat more rapidly in 1989, with a significant contribution from sharp increases in energy prices. Interest rates have declined considerably since the Committee meeting in late March. In foreign exchange markets, the trade-weighted value of the dollar in terms of the other G-10 currencies rose further on balance over the intermeeting period. Growth of M2 and M3 was sluggish in April, primarily because of a sizable decline in transactions balances. Through April, expansion of M2 has been at a rate below the Committee's range for the year, while growth of M3 has been in the lower portion of its range. The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability, promote growth in output on a sustainable basis, and contribute to an improved pattern of international transactions. In furtherance of these objectives, the Committee at its meeting in February established ranges for growth of M2 and M3 of 3 to 7 percent and 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 percent, respectively, measured from the fourth quarter of 1988 to the fourth quarter of 1989. The monitoring range for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt was set at 6-1/2 to

10-1/2 percent for the year. The behavior of the monetary aggregates will continue to be evaluated in the light of movements in their velocities, developments in the economy and financial markets, and progress toward price level stability. In the implementation of policy for the immediate future, the Committee seeks to maintain the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. Taking account of indications of inflationary pressures, the strength of the business expansion, the behavior of the monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign exchange and domestic financial markets, somewhat greater reserve restraint or somewhat lesser reserve restraint would be acceptable in the intermeeting period. The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 over the period from March through June at annual rates of about 1-1/2 and 4 percent, respectively. The Chairman may call for Committee consultation if it appears to the Manager for Domestic Operations that reserve conditions during the period before the next meeting are likely to be associated with a federal funds rate persistently outside a range of 8 to 12 percent. Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, Corrigan, Angell, Guffey, Heller, Johnson, Keehn, Kelley, LaWare, Ms. Seger, and Mr. Syron. Vote against this action: Mr. Melzer. Mr. Melzer dissented because he favored an immediate move to slightly less pressure on reserve positions. While inflation was currently too high and might move even higher in the short run, he felt that the monetary policy restraint of the past two years would eventually reduce inflationary pressures. In addition, he was concerned that the very restrictive monetary policy of recent quarters, evidenced by extremely sluggish growth of reserves, the monetary base, and the monetary aggregates, heightened the risks of a recession unless the policy were to be reversed soon. In the event of a recession, a policy response aimed at a quick recovery could make the longer-term goal of price stability even more difficult to attain.

2. Foreign Currency Authorization. At this meeting the Committee approved an increase in the limit on holdings of foreign currencies in the System Open Market Account. Paragraph 1D of the Committee's Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations permitted the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for System Open Market Account, to maintain an overall open position in all foreign currencies not exceeding $12.0 billion. System holdings of such currencies had risen rapidly this year and totaled nearly $11 billion, based on historical costs. In light of the potential for further System acquisitions of foreign currencies in coordination with similar transactions by the U.S. Treasury and in cooperation with foreign monetary authorities, the Committee agreed to raise the limit in Paragraph 1D of the Authorization to $15.0 billion, effective immediately. Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, Corrigan, Angell, Guffey, Heller, Johnson, Keehn, Kelley, Melzer, Ms. Seger and Mr. Syron. Vote against this action: Mr. LaWare. Mr. LaWare dissented because he wanted to convey his skepticism about the effectiveness of sterilized intervention in foreign exchange markets. He did not object to the specific transactions that had been conducted recently. Following the meeting the dollar remained under strong upward pressure which was resisted through very large additional System purchases of foreign currencies. Effective June 14, 1989, the Committee approved a further increase to $18.0 billion in the limit on System holdings of foreign currencies under Paragraph 1D of the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations.

Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, Corrigan, Angell, Guffey, Heller, Johnson, Keehn, Kelley, LaWare, Melzer, Ms. Seger, and Mr. Syron. Votes against this action: None.

Read the full minutes

What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes

Summary generated automatically from the two documents.

Source

Also: Minutes of Actions