March 28
Statement·Presser·Minutes
AGAlan GreenspanMarch 28, 1989 FOMC Record of Policy Actions
Vote
- Wayne D. Angell
- E. Gerald Corrigan
- Alan Greenspan
- Guffey
- H. Robert Heller
- Manuel H. Johnson
- Silas Keehn
- Edward W. Kelley, Jr.
- John P. LaWare
- Thomas C. Melzer
- Martha R. Seger • dissented
- Ms. Seger supported the decision to keep policy unchanged in the period immediately ahead, but she could not accept a directive that allowed intermeeting adjustments to be made more readily in a firming than in an easing direction as new information became available. The lagged effects of the substantial tightening that had been implemented earlier coupled with current indications of slower economic growth suggested that policy already had been tightened enough to lead to lower inflation over time. Under current circumstances, further firming carried substantial risks to interest-sensitive sectors of the economy, the level of the dollar in foreign exchange markets, and the continued growth of the economy.
- Richard F. Syron
From the minutes
FOMC minutes
Such an increase implied that the expected federal funds rate would average closer to the middle of the range. That range provides one mechanism for initiating consultation of the Committee when its boundaries are persistently exceeded. At the conclusion of the Committee's discussion, all but one member indicated that they favored or could accept a directive that called for maintaining the current degree of pressure on reserve positions and that provided for giving particular weight to potential developments that might require some firming during the intermeeting period. Accordingly, some added reserve restraint would be acceptable, or some slight lessening of reserve pressure might be acceptable, over the intermeeting period depending on indications of inflationary pressures, the strength of the business expansion, the behavior of the monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign exchange and domestic financial markets. The reserve conditions contemplated by the Committee were expected to be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 at annual rates of around 3 percent and 5 percent respectively over the three-month period from March to June. It was understood that operations would continue to be conducted with some flexibility in light of the persisting uncertainty in the relationship between the demand for borrowed reserves and the federal funds rate. At the conclusion of the meeting, the following domestic policy directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: The information reviewed at this meeting suggests that activity in the nonfarm economy has expanded appreciably further in the current quarter. After strong gains in the fourth quarter, total nonfarm payroll employment rose markedly further in January and February. The civilian unemployment rate fell considerably to 5.1 percent in February. Industrial
production was unchanged in February after rising substantially over the previous several months. After a weather-related surge in January, housing starts fell in February to a level somewhat below their average in the fourth quarter. Growth in consumer spending moderated in January and February. Recent indicators of business capital spending suggest a rebound after a decline in the fourth quarter. The nominal U.S. merchandise trade deficit was larger in the fourth quarter than in the third quarter; the preliminary estimate of the deficit for January was smaller than the average for the fourth quarter. The latest information on prices suggests some pickup in inflation from recent trends. Interest rates in both short- and long-term markets have risen considerably since the Committee meeting in early February. On February 24 the Federal Reserve Board approved an increase in the discount rate from 6-1/2 to 7 percent. In foreign exchange markets, the trade-weighted value of the dollar in terms of the other G-10 currencies rose somewhat on balance over the intermeeting period. Growth of M2 and M3 strengthened in February and apparently picked up further in March; over the first quarter such expansion was about in line with Committee expectations. M1 appears to have declined marginally since December. The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability, promote growth in output on a sustainable basis, and contribute to an improved pattern of international transactions. In furtherance of these objectives, the Committee at its meeting in February established ranges for growth of M2 and M3 of 3 to 7 percent and 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 percent, respectively, measured from the fourth quarter of 1988 to the fourth quarter of 1989. The monitoring range for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt was set at 6-1/2 to 10-1/2 percent for the year. The behavior of the monetary aggregates will continue to be evaluated in the light of movements in their velocities, develop ments in the economy and financial markets, and progress toward price level stability. In the implementation of policy for the immediate future, the Committee seeks to maintain the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. Taking account of indications of inflationary pressures, the strength of the business expansion, the behavior of the monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign
exchange and domestic financial markets, somewhat greater reserve restraint would, or slightly lesser reserve restraint might, be acceptable in the inter meeting period. The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 over the period from March through June at annual rates of about 3 and 5 percent, respectively. The Chairman may call for Committee consultation if it appears to the Manager for Domestic Operations that reserve conditions during the period before the next meeting are likely to be associated with a federal funds rate persistently outside a range of 8 to 12 percent. Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, Corrigan, Angell, Guffey, Heller, Johnson, Keehn, Kelley, LaWare, Melzer, and Syron. Votes against this action: Ms. Seger. Ms. Seger supported the decision to keep policy unchanged in the period immediately ahead, but she could not accept a directive that allowed intermeeting adjustments to be made more readily in a firming than in an easing direction as new information became available. The lagged effects of the substantial tightening that had been implemented earlier coupled with current indications of slower economic growth suggested that policy already had been tightened enough to lead to lower inflation over time. Under current circumstances, further firming carried substantial risks to interest-sensitive sectors of the economy, the level of the dollar in foreign exchange markets, and the continued growth of the economy. 2. Authorization for Domestic Open Market Operations Effective March 29, 1989, the Committee approved a temporary increase of $2 billion, to $8 billion, in the limit between Committee meetings on changes in System Account holdings of U.S. government and federal agency securities that is specified in paragraph 1(a) of the
Authorization for Domestic Open Market Operations. The increase was effective for the intermeeting period ending with the close of business on May 16, 1989. Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, Corrigan, Angell, Guffey, Heller, Johnson, Keehn, Kelley, LaWare, Melzer, Ms. Seger, and Mr. Syron. Votes against this action: None. This action was taken on the recommendation of the Manager for Domestic Operations. The Manager had advised that the usual leeway of $6 billion for changes in System Account holdings might not be suffi cient over the intermeeting period because of seasonal increases in currency in circulation and in required reserves and a large rise in Treasury balances at the Federal Reserve Banks after the tax payment date in mid-April.
What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes
- The FOMC raised the discount rate from 6-1/2 percent to 7 percent on February 24, 1989.
- The FOMC raised the intermeeting federal funds rate range by 1 percentage point to 8 to 12 percent.
- The FOMC expected M2 and M3 growth at annual rates of about 3 and 5 percent, up from 2 and 3-1/2 percent.
- The FOMC's directive shifted from "somewhat greater reserve restraint would" to "some added reserve restraint would" be acceptable.
- The FOMC approved a temporary $2 billion increase, to $8 billion, in the limit on System Account holdings changes.
- Ms. Seger dissented from the directive, while Mr. Hoskins and Mr. Parry dissented in the previous minutes.
Summary generated automatically from the two documents.
Also: Minutes of Actions