FOMCDiffNext minutes, Oct 7 in 6d 15h 52m 38s
September
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

September 21, 2016 FOMC Statement

Target range 0.25–0.50% unchanged Vote 7–3 · Dissents: George ↑, Mester ↑, Rosengren ↑ Tone: Leaning dovish -0.43

FOMC statement

Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement

For release at 2:00 p.m. EDT

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in June July indicates that the labor market strengthened has continued to strengthen and that growth of economic activity has been expanding at a moderate rate. Job gains were strong picked up from the modest pace seen in June following weak growth the first half of this year. Although the unemployment rate is little changed in May. On balance, payrolls and other labor market indicators point to some increase in labor utilization in recent months. months, job gains have been solid, on average. Household spending has been growing strongly but business fixed investment has been remained soft. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting earlier declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation remain low; most survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators conditions will strengthen. strengthen somewhat further. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of earlier declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of past declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further. Near-term risks to the economic outlook have diminished. appear roughly balanced. The Committee continues to closely monitor inflation indicators and global economic and financial developments.

Against this backdrop, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1/4 to 1/2 percent. The Committee judges that the case for an increase in the federal funds rate has strengthened but decided, for the time being, to wait for further evidence of continued progress toward its objectives. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.

In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; James Bullard; Stanley Fischer; Loretta J. Mester; Jerome H. Powell; Eric Rosengren; and Daniel K. Tarullo. Voting against the action was were: Esther L. George, who Loretta J. Mester, and Eric Rosengren, each of whom preferred at this meeting to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 1/2 to 3/4 percent.

Implementation Note issued July 27, September 21, 2016

Source

Our summary

What changed

  • The FOMC upgraded its view of economic activity, stating growth has picked up from the modest pace earlier in the year, and labor market conditions have continued to strengthen.
  • It revised its risk assessment from diminished to roughly balanced.
  • The FOMC added that the case for an increase in the federal funds rate has strengthened, but it decided to wait for further evidence of progress toward its objectives.
  • Three officials dissented, preferring to raise the target range to 1/2 to 3/4 percent, whereas only one dissented previously.

Implications

The language suggests the FOMC is moving closer to a rate hike, but it is not yet ready to act, waiting for more data. Markets may interpret this as a signal that a rate increase is likely later this year if economic conditions continue to improve.

The increased number of dissents favoring a hike highlights internal pressure for action, reinforcing the hawkish tilt in the FOMC's communication.

Summary generated automatically from the statements. Not investment advice.

Projections

2016201720182019Longer run
Real GDP growth1.8 was 2.02.02.01.81.8 was 2.0
Unemployment rate4.8 was 4.74.64.5 was 4.64.64.8
PCE inflation1.3 was 1.41.92.02.02.0
Core PCE inflation1.71.8 was 1.92.02.0
Federal funds rate0.6 was 0.91.1 was 1.61.9 was 2.42.62.9 was 3.0

Median projections of FOMC participants; previous: June.

Each dot is one participant's projection of the federal funds rate (%) at the end of each year and in the longer run.

September June median June median

43.753.53.2532.752.52.2521.751.51.2510.750.50.25 September median 0.625% June median 0.875% June: 0.625%, 6 participantsJune: 0.625%, 6 participantsJune: 0.625%, 6 participantsJune: 0.625%, 6 participantsJune: 0.625%, 6 participantsJune: 0.625%, 6 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 0.875%, 9 participantsJune: 1.125%, 1 participantJune: 1.375%, 1 participant (none now) 0.375%: 3 participants now, 0 in June0.375%: 3 participants now, 0 in June0.375%: 3 participants now, 0 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.625%: 10 participants now, 6 in June0.875%: 3 participants now, 9 in June0.875%: 3 participants now, 9 in June0.875%: 3 participants now, 9 in June1.125%: 1 participant now, 1 in June 2016 median 0.625% was 0.875%June median 0.875% September median 1.125% June median 1.625% June: 0.625%, 1 participantJune: 1.375%, 6 participantsJune: 1.375%, 6 participantsJune: 1.375%, 6 participantsJune: 1.375%, 6 participantsJune: 1.375%, 6 participantsJune: 1.375%, 6 participantsJune: 1.625%, 4 participantsJune: 1.625%, 4 participantsJune: 1.625%, 4 participantsJune: 1.625%, 4 participantsJune: 1.875%, 3 participantsJune: 1.875%, 3 participantsJune: 1.875%, 3 participantsJune: 2.125%, 1 participantJune: 2.25%, 1 participant (none now)June: 2.375%, 1 participant (none now) 0.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in June0.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in June0.875%: 1 participant now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.125%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.375%: 1 participant now, 6 in June1.625%: 2 participants now, 4 in June1.625%: 2 participants now, 4 in June1.75%: 1 participant now, 0 in June1.875%: 2 participants now, 3 in June1.875%: 2 participants now, 3 in June2.125%: 1 participant now, 1 in June 2017 median 1.125% was 1.625%June median 1.625% September median 1.875% June median 2.375% June: 0.625%, 1 participantJune: 2.125%, 4 participantsJune: 2.125%, 4 participantsJune: 2.125%, 4 participantsJune: 2.125%, 4 participantsJune: 2.375%, 5 participants (none now)June: 2.375%, 5 participants (none now)June: 2.375%, 5 participants (none now)June: 2.375%, 5 participants (none now)June: 2.375%, 5 participants (none now)June: 2.625%, 1 participantJune: 2.875%, 3 participantsJune: 2.875%, 3 participantsJune: 2.875%, 3 participantsJune: 3%, 1 participant (none now)June: 3.25%, 1 participant (none now)June: 3.375%, 1 participant (none now) 0.625%: 1 participant now, 1 in June1.625%: 2 participants now, 0 in June1.625%: 2 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June1.875%: 7 participants now, 0 in June2.125%: 1 participant now, 4 in June2.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in June2.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in June2.75%: 2 participants now, 0 in June2.75%: 2 participants now, 0 in June2.875%: 1 participant now, 3 in June3.125%: 1 participant now, 0 in June 2018 median 1.875% was 2.375%June median 2.375% September median 2.625% 0.625%: 1 participant now, 0 in June2.125%: 1 participant now, 0 in June2.375%: 3 participants now, 0 in June2.375%: 3 participants now, 0 in June2.375%: 3 participants now, 0 in June2.625%: 5 participants now, 0 in June2.625%: 5 participants now, 0 in June2.625%: 5 participants now, 0 in June2.625%: 5 participants now, 0 in June2.625%: 5 participants now, 0 in June2.75%: 1 participant now, 0 in June3%: 3 participants now, 0 in June3%: 3 participants now, 0 in June3%: 3 participants now, 0 in June3.125%: 1 participant now, 0 in June3.375%: 1 participant now, 0 in June3.75%: 1 participant now, 0 in June 2019 median 2.625% September median 2.875% June median 3% June: 2.75%, 3 participantsJune: 2.75%, 3 participantsJune: 2.75%, 3 participantsJune: 3%, 6 participantsJune: 3%, 6 participantsJune: 3%, 6 participantsJune: 3%, 6 participantsJune: 3%, 6 participantsJune: 3%, 6 participantsJune: 3.25%, 4 participants (none now)June: 3.25%, 4 participants (none now)June: 3.25%, 4 participants (none now)June: 3.25%, 4 participants (none now)June: 3.5%, 1 participantJune: 3.75%, 2 participantsJune: 3.75%, 2 participants 2.5%: 3 participants now, 0 in June2.5%: 3 participants now, 0 in June2.5%: 3 participants now, 0 in June2.75%: 5 participants now, 3 in June2.75%: 5 participants now, 3 in June2.75%: 5 participants now, 3 in June2.75%: 5 participants now, 3 in June2.75%: 5 participants now, 3 in June3%: 6 participants now, 6 in June3%: 6 participants now, 6 in June3%: 6 participants now, 6 in June3%: 6 participants now, 6 in June3%: 6 participants now, 6 in June3%: 6 participants now, 6 in June3.5%: 1 participant now, 1 in June3.75%: 1 participant now, 2 in June Longer run median 2.875% was 3%June median 3%

Scroll the chart sideways for the later years.

Implementation Note

The settings that put the decision into effect: the interest rate paid on reserves, the FOMC's instructions to the New York Fed's trading desk, and the discount rate. Changes are marked the same way as in the statement.

Source

Press conference

September 21, 2016, 2:30 p.m. ET · Read the transcript

What Yellen said that the statement didn't

Summary generated automatically from the transcript and the statement.