FOMCDiffNext minutes, Oct 7 in 6d 15h 52m 42s
December
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031

December 17, 2014 FOMC Statement

Target range 0.00–0.25% unchanged Vote 7–3 · Dissents: Fisher ↑, Kocherlakota ↓, Plosser Tone: Leaning dovish -0.68

FOMC statement

Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement

For immediate release

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in September October suggests that economic activity is expanding at a moderate pace. Labor market conditions improved somewhat further, with solid job gains and a lower unemployment rate. On balance, a range of labor market indicators suggests that underutilization of labor resources is gradually diminishing. continues to diminish. Household spending is rising moderately and business fixed investment is advancing, while the recovery in the housing sector remains slow. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee's longer-run objective. objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices. Market-based measures of inflation compensation have declined somewhat; somewhat further; survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace, with labor market indicators and inflation moving toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the risks to the outlook for economic activity and the labor market as nearly balanced. Although The Committee expects inflation in to rise gradually toward 2 percent as the near term will likely be held down by labor market improves further and the transitory effects of lower energy prices and other factors, the factors dissipate. The Committee judges that the likelihood of continues to monitor inflation running persistently below 2 percent has diminished somewhat since early this year. developments closely.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that the current 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate remains appropriate. In determining how long to maintain this target range, the Committee will assess progress--both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. The Committee anticipates, based Based on its current assessment, the Committee judges that it can be patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy. The Committee sees this guidance as consistent with its previous statement that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time following the end of its asset purchase program this month, in October, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee's 2 percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored. However, if incoming information indicates faster progress toward the Committee's employment and inflation objectives than the Committee now expects, then increases in the target range for the federal funds rate are likely to occur sooner than currently anticipated. Conversely, if progress proves slower than expected, then increases in the target range are likely to occur later than currently anticipated.

The Committee judges that there has been a substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market since the inception of its current asset purchase program. Moreover, the Committee continues to see sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing progress toward maximum employment in a context of price stability. Accordingly, the Committee decided to conclude its asset purchase program this month. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. This policy, by keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.

When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent. The Committee currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation are near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the Committee views as normal in the longer run.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; Stanley Fischer; Loretta J. Mester; Jerome H. Powell; and Daniel K. Tarullo.

Voting against the action were Richard W. Fisher, who believed that, while the Committee should be patient in beginning to normalize monetary policy, improvement in the U.S. economic performance since October has moved forward, further than the majority of the Committee envisions, the date when it will likely be appropriate to increase the federal funds rate; Narayana Kocherlakota, who believed that the Committee's decision, in the context of ongoing low inflation and falling market-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations, created undue downside risk to the credibility of the 2 percent inflation target; and Charles I. Plosser, who believed that the statement should not stress the importance of the passage of time as a key element of its forward guidance and, given the improvement in economic conditions, should not emphasize the consistency of the current forward guidance with previous statements.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; Stanley Fischer; Richard W. Fisher; Loretta J. Mester; Charles I. Plosser; Jerome H. Powell; and Daniel K. Tarullo. Voting against the action was Narayana Kocherlakota, who believed that, in light of continued sluggishness in the inflation outlook and the recent slide in market-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations, the Committee should commit to keeping the current target range for the federal funds rate at least until the one-to-two-year ahead inflation outlook has returned to 2 percent and should continue the asset purchase program at its current level.

Statement Regarding Purchases of Treasury Securities and Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities

Source

Our summary

What changed

  • The FOMC replaced its 'considerable time' forward guidance with language saying it 'can be patient' in beginning to normalize policy, while noting consistency with the prior guidance.
  • The statement removed the October decision to conclude the asset purchase program, reflecting that the program ended in October; reinvestment policy is unchanged.
  • Inflation language now cites declines in energy prices as a partial cause and adds that inflation is expected to rise gradually toward 2 percent as transitory effects dissipate.
  • The FOMC added that it 'continues to monitor inflation developments closely,' a new emphasis not present in the previous statement.
  • The vote changed from one dissenter to three: Fisher, Kocherlakota, and Plosser dissented, each with different objections to the guidance or inflation stance.

Implications

The shift to 'patient' language signals a more flexible approach to liftoff, likely interpreted as reducing the time-based commitment while keeping rates low for now.

The added inflation monitoring and gradual-rise expectation suggest the FOMC sees low inflation as transitory, but the three dissents highlight internal disagreement over the pace of normalization and inflation credibility.

Summary generated automatically from the statements. Not investment advice.

Projections

2014201520162017Longer run
Real GDP growth
Unemployment rate
PCE inflation
Core PCE inflation
Federal funds rate

Median projections of FOMC participants; previous: September.

Each dot is one participant's projection of the federal funds rate (%) at the end of each year and in the longer run.

December September median September median

4.54.2543.753.53.2532.752.52.2521.751.51.2510.750.50.250 December median 0.125% September median 0.125% September: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 16 participantsSeptember: 0.875%, 1 participant (none now) 0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September0.125%: 17 participants now, 16 in September 2014 median 0.125% was 0.125%September median 0.125% December median 1.125% September median 1.375% September: 0.125%, 2 participantsSeptember: 0.125%, 2 participantsSeptember: 0.375%, 1 participant (none now)September: 0.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 0.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 0.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 1.125%, 2 participantsSeptember: 1.125%, 2 participantsSeptember: 1.375%, 3 participants (none now)September: 1.375%, 3 participants (none now)September: 1.375%, 3 participants (none now)September: 1.625%, 1 participantSeptember: 1.875%, 4 participantsSeptember: 1.875%, 4 participantsSeptember: 1.875%, 4 participantsSeptember: 1.875%, 4 participantsSeptember: 2.875%, 1 participant (none now) 0.125%: 2 participants now, 2 in September0.125%: 2 participants now, 2 in September0.625%: 2 participants now, 0 in September0.625%: 2 participants now, 0 in September0.875%: 4 participants now, 3 in September0.875%: 4 participants now, 3 in September0.875%: 4 participants now, 3 in September0.875%: 4 participants now, 3 in September1.125%: 3 participants now, 2 in September1.125%: 3 participants now, 2 in September1.125%: 3 participants now, 2 in September1.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in September1.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in September1.875%: 4 participants now, 4 in September1.875%: 4 participants now, 4 in September1.875%: 4 participants now, 4 in September1.875%: 4 participants now, 4 in September 2015 median 1.125% was 1.375%September median 1.375% December median 2.5% September median 2.875% September: 0.375%, 1 participantSeptember: 1.125%, 1 participantSeptember: 1.625%, 1 participant (none now)September: 2.125%, 2 participantsSeptember: 2.125%, 2 participantsSeptember: 2.375%, 2 participantsSeptember: 2.375%, 2 participantsSeptember: 2.625%, 1 participantSeptember: 2.875%, 2 participantsSeptember: 2.875%, 2 participantsSeptember: 3%, 1 participant (none now)September: 3.125%, 1 participantSeptember: 3.375%, 1 participantSeptember: 3.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 4%, 1 participant 0.375%: 1 participant now, 1 in September1.125%: 1 participant now, 1 in September1.875%: 2 participants now, 0 in September1.875%: 2 participants now, 0 in September2.125%: 3 participants now, 2 in September2.125%: 3 participants now, 2 in September2.125%: 3 participants now, 2 in September2.375%: 1 participant now, 2 in September2.5%: 1 participant now, 0 in September2.625%: 1 participant now, 1 in September2.875%: 1 participant now, 2 in September3.125%: 2 participants now, 1 in September3.125%: 2 participants now, 1 in September3.375%: 1 participant now, 1 in September3.625%: 1 participant now, 0 in September3.875%: 1 participant now, 3 in September4%: 1 participant now, 1 in September 2016 median 2.5% was 2.875%September median 2.875% December median 3.625% September median 3.75% September: 2%, 1 participantSeptember: 2.625%, 1 participantSeptember: 3.125%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.125%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.125%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.375%, 2 participantsSeptember: 3.375%, 2 participantsSeptember: 3.625%, 1 participantSeptember: 3.75%, 2 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 2 participantsSeptember: 3.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.875%, 3 participantsSeptember: 4%, 1 participantSeptember: 4.125%, 1 participantSeptember: 4.25%, 1 participantSeptember: 4.375%, 1 participant (none now) 2%: 1 participant now, 1 in September2.625%: 1 participant now, 1 in September2.875%: 1 participant now, 0 in September3.125%: 2 participants now, 3 in September3.125%: 2 participants now, 3 in September3.375%: 2 participants now, 2 in September3.375%: 2 participants now, 2 in September3.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in September3.625%: 2 participants now, 1 in September3.75%: 3 participants now, 2 in September3.75%: 3 participants now, 2 in September3.75%: 3 participants now, 2 in September3.875%: 1 participant now, 3 in September4%: 1 participant now, 1 in September4.125%: 1 participant now, 1 in September4.25%: 2 participants now, 1 in September4.25%: 2 participants now, 1 in September 2017 median 3.625% was 3.75%September median 3.75% December median 3.75% September median 3.75% September: 3.25%, 1 participantSeptember: 3.5%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.5%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.5%, 3 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 6 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 6 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 6 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 6 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 6 participantsSeptember: 3.75%, 6 participantsSeptember: 3.875%, 2 participants (none now)September: 3.875%, 2 participants (none now)September: 4%, 3 participantsSeptember: 4%, 3 participantsSeptember: 4%, 3 participantsSeptember: 4.25%, 2 participantsSeptember: 4.25%, 2 participants 3.25%: 1 participant now, 1 in September3.5%: 3 participants now, 3 in September3.5%: 3 participants now, 3 in September3.5%: 3 participants now, 3 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September3.75%: 8 participants now, 6 in September4%: 3 participants now, 3 in September4%: 3 participants now, 3 in September4%: 3 participants now, 3 in September4.25%: 2 participants now, 2 in September4.25%: 2 participants now, 2 in September Longer run median 3.75% was 3.75%September median 3.75%

Scroll the chart sideways for the later years.

Press conference

December 17, 2014, 2:30 p.m. ET · Read the transcript

What Yellen said that the statement didn't

Summary generated automatically from the transcript and the statement.