September 20
Statement·Presser·Minutes
AGAlan GreenspanSeptember 20, 1988 FOMC Record of Policy Actions
Vote
- Wayne D. Angell
- Black
- E. Gerald Corrigan
- Robert P. Forrestal
- Alan Greenspan
- H. Robert Heller
- Hoskins
- Manuel H. Johnson
- Edward W. Kelley, Jr.
- John P. LaWare
- Robert T. Parry
- Martha R. Seger
From the minutes
FOMC minutes
In the Committee's discussion of policy implementation for the weeks immediately ahead, all of the members agreed on a proposal calling for an unchanged policy stance pending an evaluation of further economic developments. Those who perceived the risks in the economic outlook as still decidedly on the side of continued strong demand and greater inflationary pressures saw enough uncertainties in the current economic situation to warrant a pause in the policy firming process, Others were less persuaded that inflationary pressures would intensify, especially given the degree of policy restraint that already had been implemented over the past several months. It was noted that additional firming at this time could have undesirable repercussions on the dollar in foreign exchange markets and on the financial condition of many already troubled depository institutions. Some members expressed concern that a marked weakening in the economy, which would become a greater risk if policy were tightened further, would disrupt the urgent task of reducing the federal budget deficit. In their consideration of a desirable policy for the near term, the members took account of a staff analysis which suggested that monetary expansion was likely to remain relatively damped in coming months. This outlook assumed a continuing lagged adjustment of offering rates on retail deposits to earlier increases in market interest rates. With regard to possible adjustments in the degree of reserve pressure during the intermeeting period, all of the members indicated that the balance of risks in the economy were such that they favored or could accept a directive that would more readily accommodate a move toward firming than an adjustment toward easing in the weeks ahead.
Some commented that near-term developments were not likely to call for a policy change in this period, while others saw a greater likelihood that intermeeting developments would point to the desirability of some firming. The potential need for some easing was viewed as remote. Committee's discussion, all of the At the conclusion of the members approved a directive that called for maintaining the current on reserve positions. The members decided that degree of pressure somewhat greater reserve restraint would be acceptable, or slightly lesser reserve restraint might be acceptable, over the intermeeting period depending on indications of inflationary pressures, the strength of the business expansion, the behavior of the monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign exchange and domestic financial markets. The reserve conditions contemplated by the Committee were expected to be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 at annual rates of around 3 percent and 5 percent, respectively, over the four-month period from August to December. The members agreed that the intermeeting range for the federal funds rate, which provides one mechanism for initiating con sultation of the Committee when its boundaries are persistently ex ceeded, should be left unchanged at 6 to 10 percent. At the conclusion of the meeting, the following domestic policy directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: The information reviewed at this meeting suggests that the expansion in economic activity may be moderating from the vigorous pace earlier in the year. Total nonfarm payroll employment grew more slowly in July and August, though the increases in the two months were still sizable. The civilian unemployment rate rose to 5.6 percent in August. Industrial production advanced slightly further in August after a sharp increase in July. Retail sales were flat in July and August. Recent indicators of business capital spending suggest some moderation from the especially rapid growth
the year. Preliminary data for the in earlier months of trade deficit in July showed nominal U.S. merchandise further reduction from the improved second-quarter some The latest information on prices suggests little rate. if any change from recent trends. Most interest rates have declined somewhat since the Committee meeting on August 16. Over the inter meeting period, the trade-weighted foreign exchange value of the dollar in terms of the other G-10 currencies was about unchanged on balance. Expansion of M2 and M3 moderated further in August. For the year through August, M2 has grown at a rate slightly above, and M3 at a rate more noticeably above, the midpoints of the ranges established by the Committee for 1988. Ml was unchanged in August after registering relatively strong growth in June and July. Expansion of total domestic nonfinancial debt for the year thus far appears to be at a pace somewhat below that in 1987. The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability over time, promote growth in output on a sustainable basis, and contribute to an improved pattern of international transactions. In furtherance of these objectives, the Committee at its meeting in late June reaffirmed the ranges it had established in February for growth of 4 to 8 percent for both M2 and M3, measured from the fourth quarter of 1987 to the fourth quarter of 1988. The monitoring range for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt was also maintained at 7 to 11 percent for the year. For 1989, the Committee agreed on tentative ranges for monetary growth, measured from the fourth quarter of 1988 to the fourth quarter of 1989, of 3 to 7 percent for M2 and 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 percent for M3. The Committee set the associated monitoring range for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt at 6-1/2 to 10-1/2 percent. It was understood that all these ranges were provisional and that they would be reviewed in early 1989 in the light of intervening developments. With respect to Ml, the Committee reaffirmed its decision in February not to establish a specific target for 1988 and also decided not to set a tentative range for 1989. The behavior of this aggregate will continue to be evaluated in the light of movements in its velocity, developments in the economy and financial markets, and the nature of emerging price pressures.
In the implementation of policy for the immediate future, the Committee seeks to maintain the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. Taking account of indications of inflationary pressures, the strength of the business expansion, the behavior of the monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign exchange and domestic financial markets, somewhat greater reserve restraint would, or slightly lesser reserve restraint might, be acceptable in the intermeeting period. The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to be consistent with growth of M2 and M3 over the period from August through December at annual rates of about 3 and 5 percent, respectively. The Chairman may call for Committee consultation if it appears to the Manager for Domestic Operations that reserve conditions during the period before the next meeting are likely to be associated with a federal funds rate persistently outside a range of 6 to 10 percent. Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan, Corrigan, Angell, Black, Forrestal, Heller, Hoskins, Johnson, Kelley, LaWare, Parry, and Ms. Seger.
What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes
- The FOMC revised its M2 and M3 growth expectations for the intermeeting period from 3-1/2 and 5-1/2 percent to 3 and 5 percent, over August to December.
- The FOMC left the federal funds rate range unchanged at 6 to 10 percent, after raising it by 1 percentage point in August.
- The FOMC noted the civilian unemployment rate rose to 5.6 percent in August, up from 5.4 percent in July.
- The FOMC reported M1 was unchanged in August, after strong growth in June and July.
- The FOMC's directive changed the reserve growth period from June through September to August through December.
- Mr. Hoskins voted with the FOMC in September, after dissenting in August for greater monetary restraint.
Summary generated automatically from the two documents.
Also: Minutes of Actions