September
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

September 23, 1986 FOMC Record of Policy Actions

Vote

From the minutes

FOMC minutes

expectations, though this growth would continue to be viewed in the context of other economic and financial developments. Most of these members did not want to rule out the possibility of some easing in the weeks immediately ahead, but they saw the prospects for such a move as less likely, and two favored a directive that would not contemplate any easing. Other members felt that there should be no presumptions about the likely direction of any intermeeting adjustments, given the many uncertainties that existed about the behavior of the monetary aggregates and about prospective economic and financial developments. The members agreed that the behavior of the dollar on foreign exchange markets could be an important factor influencing any small intermeeting adjustments. At the conclusion of the Committee's discussion, all but one member indicated that they favored a directive that called for no change in the current degree of pressure on reserve positions. The members expected this approach to policy implementation to be consistent with some reduction in the growth of M2 and M3 to annual rates of 7 to 9 percent over the four-month period from August to December. Over the same interval, growth in Ml was expected to moderate from the exceptionally large increase during the past several months. Because the prospective behavior of M1 remained subject to unusual uncertainty, the Committee again decided not to specify a rate of expected growth for this aggregate in the operational paragraph of the directive but to continue to evaluate Ml in the light of the performance of the broader aggregates and other factors. The members indicated that slightly greater reserve restraint would, or slightly lesser restraint might, be acceptable over the intermeeting period depending on the behavior of the

monetary aggregates, taking into account the strength of the business expansion, the performance of the dollar in foreign exchange markets, progress against inflation, and conditions in domestic and international credit markets. The members agreed that the intermeeting range for the federal funds rate, which provides a mechanism for initiating consultation of the Committee when its boundaries are persistently exceeded, should be left unchanged at 4 to 8 percent. At the conclusion of the meeting, the following domestic policy directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: The information reviewed at this meeting suggests some pickup in the growth of economic activity from the slow pace in the second quarter. In August total nonfarm payroll employment grew considerably further, with employment in manufacturing rising for the first time since January. The civilian unemployment rate edged down further to 6.8 percent. Industrial production rose slightly in July and August after declining on balance during the first half of the year. Consumer spending relatively strong in recent months, with has remained gains in retail sales in August paced by a sharp rise in auto sales. Housing starts in July and August stayed at a relatively high level. Business capital spending appears to have remained sluggish, reflecting weakness in nonresidential construction. A more moderate rate of wage increases has been sustained in while broad measures of prices have recent months, somewhat due to developments in food and energy firmed markets. value of the dollar against major The trade-weighted currencies is essentially unchanged on balance foreign the August 19 meeting of the Committee. Preliminary since merchandise trade deficit in July data for the U.S. deficit than in previous months. indicate a larger Growth of M2 and especially of M3 moderated in two aggregates for the August, but expansion of these at the upper end of their year through August has been by the Committee for 1986. respective ranges established to grow very rapidly. Expansion In August Ml continued

in total domestic nonfinancial debt remains appreciably above the Committee's monitoring range for 1986. Short term interest rates have declined further since the meeting of the Committee while long-term market August rates have risen on balance. On August 20, the Federal Reserve Board approved a reduction in the discount rate from 6 to 5-1/2 percent. The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster reasonable price stability over time, promote growth in output on a sustainable basis, and contribute to an improved pattern of international transactions. In furtherance of these objectives the Committee agreed at the July meeting to reaffirm the ranges established in February for growth of 6 to 9 percent for both M2 and M3, measured from the fourth quarter of 1985 to the fourth quarter of 1986. With respect to Ml, the Committee recognized that, based on the experience of recent years, the behavior of that aggregate is subject to substantial uncertainties in relation to economic activity and prices, depending among other things on the responsiveness of M1 growth to changes in interest rates. In light of these un certainties and of the substantial decline in velocity in the first half of the year, the Committee decided that growth of M1 in excess of the previously established 3 to 8 percent range for 1986 would be acceptable. Acceptable growth of M1 over the remainder of the year will depend on the behavior of velocity, growth in the other monetary aggregates, developments in the economy and financial markets, and price pressures. Given its rapid growth in the early part of the year, the Committee recognized that the increase in total domestic nonfinancial debt in 1986 may exceed its monitoring range of 8 to 11 percent, but felt an increase in that range would provide an inappropriate benchmark for evaluating longer-term trends in that aggregate. For 1987 the Committee agreed on tentative ranges of monetary growth, measured from the fourth quarter of 1986 to the fourth quarter of 1987, of 5-1/2 to 8-1/2 percent for M2 and M3. While a range of 3 to 8 percent for Ml in 1987 would appear appropriate in the light of most historical experience, the Committee recognized that the exceptional uncertainties surrounding the behavior of M1 velocity over the more recent period would require careful appraisal of the target range at the beginning of 1987. The associated range for growth in total domestic nonfinancial debt was provisionally set at 8 to 11 percent for 1987.

In the implementation of policy for the immediate future, the Committee seeks to maintain the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. This action is expected to be consistent with growth in M2 and M3 over the period from August to December at annual rates of 7 to 9 percent. While growth in Ml is expected to moderate from the exceptionally large increase during the past several months, that growth will continue to be judged in the light of the behavior of M2 and M3 and other factors. Slightly greater reserve restaint would, or slightly lesser reserve restraint might, be acceptable depending on the behavior of the aggregates, taking into account the strength of the business expansion, develop ments in foreign exchange markets, progress against inflation, and conditions in domestic and international credit markets. The Chairman may call for Committee consultation if it appears to the Manager for Domestic that reserve conditions during the period Operations before the next meeting are likely to be associated with a federal funds rate persistently outside a range of 4 to 8 percent. Votes for this action: Messrs. Volcker, Corrigan, Angell, Guffey, Heller, Mrs. Horn, Messrs. Johnson, Melzer, Morris, Rice, and Ms. Seger. Vote against this action: Mr. Wallich. because he preferred a slight tightening Mr. Wallich dissented about the persistence of rapid of reserve conditions. He was concerned potential for inflation. In his monetary expansion and the associated of reserves was needed to increase view some reduction in the availability in monetary growth over the months the likelihood of significant slowing ahead.

Read the full minutes

What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes

Summary generated automatically from the two documents.

Source

Also: Minutes of Actions