July 9–10
Statement·Presser·Minutes
PVPaul A. VolckerJuly 9–10, 1985 FOMC Record of Policy Actions
Vote
- Balles
- Black • dissented
- Mr. Black dissented because he preferred a rebased range of 4 to 7 percent for M1, which he thought was more likely to be consistent with both sustained economic expansion and progress towards price stability. In particular, he was concerned that the higher 8 percent top of the rebased range adopted by the Committee might tend to prolong the process of reducing M1 growth to a noninflationary rate.
- E. Gerald Corrigan
- Robert P. Forrestal
- Lyle E. Gramley
- Silas Keehn
- Wm. McC. Martin
- J. Charles Partee
- Emmett J. Rice
- Martha R. Seger
- Volcker
- Henry C. Wallich
From the minutes
FOMC minutes
7/9-10/85 -21- period they expected the expansion of Ml to slow substantially to an annual rate of 5 to 6 percent. The members agreed that somewhat lesser restraint on reserve positions might be acceptable in the event of sub stantially slower-than-expected growth in the monetary aggregates, while somewhat greater restraint would be acceptable if monetary growth were substantially faster. It was understood that the need for lesser or greater restraint would be considered against the background of develop ments relating to the strength of the business expansion, inflationary pressures, and conditions in domestic credit and foreign exchange markets. The members agreed that the intermeeting range for the federal funds rate should be left at 6 to 10 percent. At the conclusion of the meeting, the following domestic policy directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: The information reviewed at this meeting suggests some pickup in the expansion of economic activity in recent months following virtually no growth in the first quarter. Total retail sales rose on balance in April and May to a level appreciably above the average for the first quarter, and housing starts held earlier gains after rising substantially in the first quarter. Information on business capital spending suggests further growth, though at a much less rapid pace than earlier in the economic expansion. Industrial production declined slightly in April and May after rising little over the first quarter. Total nonfarm payroll employ ment increased at a somewhat reduced pace in May and June with employment in manufacturing registering further declines. The civilian unemployment rate remained at 7.3 percent in June, unchanged since February. Broad measures of prices and wages appear to be rising at rates close to those recorded in 1984.
7/9-10/85 Committee's meeting in May, the trade Since the weighted value of the dollar against major foreign currencies has generally moved within a relatively but recently has declined to a level narrow range below its April low. The merchandise trade deficit in April-May widened from the first-quarter rate as both and nonagricultural exports fell, while agricultural imports remained close to their high first-quarter level. Ml expanded very rapidly in May and June after growing at a moderate pace in the preceding two months. The broader aggregates also grew more rapidly in May and June after slowing appreciably earlier. From the of 1984 through June, Ml grew at a rate fourth quarter well above the Committee's range for 1985; M2 increased at a rate around the upper end of its longer-run range; while M3 expanded at a rate in the upper half of its range. Expansion in total domestic nonfinancial debt slowed a little in the second quarter but remained high relative to the Committee's monitoring range for the year. Interest rates have declined somewhat further since the May meeting of the Committee. The Federal Open Market Committee seeks to foster monetary and financial conditions that will help to reduce inflation further, promote growth in output on a sustainable basis, and contribute to an improved pattern of international transactions. In furtherance of these objectives the Committee at this meeting reaffirmed ranges for the year of 6 to 9 percent for M2 and 6 to 9-1/2 percent for M3. The associated range for total domestic nonfinancial debt was reaffirmed at 9 to 12 percent. With respect to Ml, the base was moved forward to the second quarter of 1985 and a range was established at an annual growth rate of 3 to 8 percent. The range takes account of expectations of a return of velocity growth toward more usual patterns, following the sharp decline in velocity during the first half of the year, while also recognizing a higher degree of uncertainty regarding that behavior. The appropriateness of the new range will continue to be reexamined in the light of evidence with respect to economic and financial developments including develop ments in foreign exchange markets. More generally, the
7/9-10/85 -23- Committee agreed that growth in the aggregates may be in the upper parts of their ranges, depending on continuing developments with respect to velocity and provided that inflationary pressures remain subdued. For 1986 the Committee agreed on tentative ranges of monetary growth, measured from the fourth quarter of 1985 to the fourth quarter of 1986, of 4 to 7 percent for Ml, 6 to 9 percent for M2, and 6 to 9 percent for M3. The associated range for growth in total domestic non financial debt was provisionally set at 8 to 11 percent for 1986. With respect to Ml particularly, the Committee recognized that uncertainties surrounding recent behavior of velocity would require careful reappraisal of the target range at the beginning of 1986. Moreover, in establishing ranges for next year, the Committee also recognized that account would need to be taken of experience with institutional and depositor behavior in response to the completion of deposit rate deregulation early in the year. In the implementation of policy for the immediate future, the Committee seeks to maintain the existing degree of pressure on reserve positions. This action is expected to be consistent with growth in M2 and M3 at an annual rate of around 7-1/2 percent during the period from June to September, and with a substantial slowing of Ml growth to an annual rate of 5 to 6 percent. Somewhat lesser reserve restraint might be acceptable in the event of substantially slower growth of the monetary aggregates while somewhat greater restraint would be acceptable in the event of substantially higher growth. In either case such a change would be considered in the context of appraisals of the strength of the business expansion, progress against inflation, and conditions in domestic credit and foreign exchange markets. The Chairman may call for Committee consultation if it appears to the Manager for Domestic Operations that pursuit of the monetary objectives and related reserve paths during the period before the next meeting is likely to be associated with a federal funds rate persistently outside a range of 6 to 10 percent.
7/9-10/85 -24- Votes for the short-run operational paragraph: Messrs. Volcker, Corrigan, Balles, Forrestal, Keehn, Partee, Martin, Rice, and Wallich. Votes against this action: Mr. Black and Ms. Seger. (Absent and not voting: Mr. Gramley.) Mr. Black dissented because he believed some increase in the degree of reserve pressure was needed to help assure an adequate slowing of Ml growth over the months ahead. Ms. Seger dissented because she favored some easing of reserve conditions to help reduce current financial strains, moderate the strength of the dollar in foreign exchange markets, and promote faster economic expansion.
What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes
- The FOMC rebased the M1 target range to 3-8 percent from the second quarter of 1985, replacing the 4-7 percent range from the fourth quarter of 1984.
- The FOMC set tentative 1986 ranges of 4-7 percent for M1, 6-9 percent for M2, 6-9 percent for M3, and 8-11 percent for debt.
- The FOMC lowered the upper limit of the tentative 1986 M3 range by 0.5 percentage point to 9 percent from the 1985 range.
- The FOMC reduced the tentative 1986 debt monitoring range by 1 percentage point to 8-11 percent from the 1985 range of 9-12 percent.
- The FOMC expected M1 growth to slow to 5-6 percent for June to September, versus about 6 percent or a little higher for March to June.
- The FOMC expected M2 and M3 growth of about 7-1/2 percent for June to September, versus 7 and 8 percent respectively for March to June.
Summary generated automatically from the two documents.
Also: Minutes of Actions