October 5
Statement·Presser·Minutes
PVPaul A. VolckerOctober 5, 1982 FOMC Record of Policy Actions
Vote
- Balles
- Black ↑ dissented
- Mr. Black dissented from this action because he preferred to direct operations in the period immediately ahead toward restraining monetary growth. Although he was mindful of the current difficulties of interpreting the behavior of M1, he was concerned that the recent strength in M1 might be followed by still more rapid growth in lagged response to the substantial decline in short-term interest rates that had occurred in the summer, which could require even more restrictive operations later.
- Ford ↑ dissented
- Mr. Ford dissented from this action because he preferred a policy for the period immediately ahead that was more firmly directed toward restraining monetary growth, although he recognized that the behavior of M1 in particular would be difficult to interpret. He was concerned that the Committee's policy directive might be misinterpreted in ways that could adversely affect pursuit of the System's longer-run anti-inflationary objectives, particularly in the context of a highly expansive fiscal policy program.
- Lyle E. Gramley
- Horn • dissented
- Mrs. Horn dissented from this action because she preferred to continue setting a specific objective for growth of M1, as well as for M2, over the current quarter, notwithstanding the problems of interpreting its behavior. In setting a target for M1, she would tolerate faster growth early in the period, owing to the uncertain impact of the proceeds from maturing all savers certificates, and would give greater weight to the behavior of M2 for some weeks after the introduction of the new instrument at depository institutions.
- Wm. McC. Martin
- J. Charles Partee
- Emmett J. Rice
- Solomon
- Nancy H. Teeters
- Volcker
- Henry C. Wallich
From the minutes
FOMC minutes
economic conditions. Growth markets in the light of current private credit of M2 from the fourth quarter of 1981 to the fourth quarter of 1982 might for the year that the Committee had reaffirmed be somewhat above the range then that for a time it would tolerate in July; the Committee had also agreed the target range, in the event of unusual precautionary growth somewhat above liquidity, and that such growth would be consistent demands for money and objectives. Recent and prospective market and economic with longer-term consistent with that approach. Somewhat slower growth conditions appeared from September to December, bringing those aggregates around over the period the upper part of the ranges for the year ending in the fourth quarter of 1982, would be acceptable and desirable in a context of declining interest rates. Should economic and financial uncertainties lead to still stronger liquidity demands, somewhat more rapid growth in the broader aggregates would be tolerated. The intermeeting range for the federal funds rate, which provides a mechanism for initiating further consultation of the Committee, was set at 7 to 10-1/2 percent. The following domestic policy directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: The information reviewed at this meeting suggests that real GNP changed little in the third quarter, following a small increase in the second quarter, while prices on the average continued to rise more slowly than in 1981. In August the nominal value of retail sales fell back to the sharply reduced June level, while industrial production and nonfarm payroll employment also declined. Housing starts fell, re versing much of the substantial July increase. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 9.8 percent in August, but claims for unemployment insurance have
risen further in recent weeks and there are indica tions of some further decline in production. In recent months the advance in the index of average hourly earnings has remained considerably less rapid than during 1981. The weighted average value of the dollar against major foreign currencies has risen strongly further over the past month, reflecting in part a continuing concern in the market about economic and financial difficulties abroad and also some firming of U.S. interest rates relative to foreign rates after a considerable drop earlier. The U.S. merchandise trade deficit rose sharply in August and on average in July and August the deficit rate was well above that for the first half. After three months of weakness, M1 grew rapidly in August and September; growth in M2 accelerated in August from an already rapid pace but appears to have slowed markedly in September. Following large declines over the preceding two months, short-term market interest rates have risen somewhat on balance since late August, while bond yields and mortgage rates have continued to decline. The Federal Reserve discount rate was reduced from 10-1/2 percent to 10 percent in late August. Mean while, reflecting some well-publicized problems in recent months of a few banks here and abroad and the financing difficulties of Mexico, a more cautious atmosphere in private credit markets has been reflected in wider spreads between U.S. government and some private credit instruments. The Federal Open Market Committee seeks to foster monetary and financial conditions that will help to reduce inflation, promote a resumption of growth in output on a sustainable basis, and contribute to a sustainable pattern of international transactions. In July, the Committee agreed that these objectives would be furthered by reaffirming the monetary growth ranges for the period from the fourth quarter of 1981 to the fourth quarter of 1982 that it had set at the February meeting. These ranges were 2-1/2 to 5-1/2 percent for Ml, 6 to 9 percent for M2, and 6-1/2 to 9-1/2 percent for M3. The associated range for bank credit was 6 to 9 percent. The Committee agreed that growth in the monetary and credit aggregates around the top of the indicated ranges would be acceptable in the light of
the relatively low base period for the M1 target and other factors, and that it would tolerate for some period of time growth somewhat above the target range should unusual precautionary demands for money and liquidity be evident in the light of current economic uncertainties. The Committee also indicated that it was tentatively planning to continue the current ranges for 1983 but that it would review that decision carefully in the light of developments over the remainder of 1982. Specification of the behavior of M1 over the balance of the year is subject to unusually great uncertainties because it will be substantially affected by special circumstances -- in the very near term by reinvestment of funds from maturing all savers certificates and later by the public's response to the new account directly competitive with money market funds mandated by recent legislation. The probable difficulties in interpretation of M1 during the period suggest much less than usual weight be placed on movements in that aggregate during the current quarter. These developments are expected to affect M2 and other broader aggregates to a much smaller extent. In all the circumstances, the Committee seeks to maintain expansion in bank reserves needed for an orderly and sustained flow of money and credit, consistent with growth of M2 (and M3) in a range of around 8-1/2 to 9-1/2 percent at an annual rate from September to December, and taking account of the desir ability of somewhat reduced pressures in private credit markets in the light of current economic conditions. Somewhat slower growth, bringing those aggregates around the upper part of the ranges set for the year, would be acceptable and desirable in a context of declining interest rates. Should economic and financial uncertainties lead to exceptional liquidity demands, somewhat more rapid growth in the broader aggregates would be tolerated. The Chairman may call for Committee con sultation if it appears to the Manager for Domestic Operations that pursuit of the monetary objectives and related reserve paths during the period before the next meeting is likely to be associated with a federal funds rate persistently outside a range of 7 to 10-1/2 percent. Votes for this action: Messrs. Volcker, Solomon, Balles, Gramley, Martin, Partee, Rice, Mrs. Teeters, and Mr. Wallich. Votes against this action: Messrs. Black and Ford and Mrs. Horn.
Mr. Black dissented from this action because he preferred to direct operations in the period immediately ahead toward restraining monetary growth. Although he was mindful of the current difficulties of interpreting the behavior of M1, he was concerned that the recent strength in M1 might be followed by still more rapid growth in lagged response to the substantial decline in short-term interest rates that had occurred in the summer, which could require even more restrictive operations later. Mr. Ford dissented from this action because he preferred a policy for the period immediately ahead that was more firmly directed toward re straining monetary growth, although he recognized that the behavior of M1 in particular would be difficult to interpret. He was concerned that the Committee's policy directive might be misinterpreted in ways that could adversely affect pursuit of the System's longer-run anti-inflationary objectives, particularly in the context of a highly expansive fiscal policy program. Mrs. Horn dissented from this action because she preferred to continue setting a specific objective for growth of M1, as well as for M2, over the current quarter, notwithstanding the problems of interpreting its behavior. In setting a target for M1, she would tolerate faster growth early in the period, owing to the uncertain impact of the proceeds from maturing all savers certificates, and would give greater weight to the behavior of M2 for some weeks after the introduction of the new instrument at depository institutions.
What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes
- The FOMC dropped its specific M1 growth objective for September to December, citing fourth-quarter measurement distortions.
- The FOMC set a new M2 and M3 growth range of 8-1/2 to 9-1/2 percent from September to December, replacing the prior M1 and M2 targets.
- The federal funds rate intermeeting range was narrowed from 7 to 11 percent to 7 to 10-1/2 percent.
- The FOMC authorized a special $325 million swap arrangement with the Bank of Mexico, adding to the existing $700 million line.
- The discount rate was reduced from 10-1/2 percent to 10 percent effective August 27, 1982.
- The FOMC noted the dollar had risen about 5 percent since the last meeting, whereas it had changed little on balance previously.
Summary generated automatically from the two documents.
Also: Minutes of Actions