September 28–29
Statement·Presser·Minutes
MEMarriner S. EcclesSeptember 28–29, 1942 FOMC Minutes
Vote
- Ernest G. Draper
- Marriner S. Eccles
- Rudolph M. Evans
- R. R. Gilbert
- H. G. Leedy
- John K. McKee • dissented
- Ronald Ransom
- Allan Sproul • dissented
- M.S. Szymczak • dissented
- Alfred H. Williams
- C. S. Young
From the minutes
FOMC minutes
therein with respect to the financing to be done in October. He stated that, in addition to the $400,000,000 of additional funds that would re sult from the continued weekly offering of $400,000,000 of bills, with an increase in the weekly issue to $450,000,000 beginning October 21, and the approximate $500,000,000 that could be obtained from additional sales of the Series C tax note, he would favor the offering in October of a 2 per cent bond, which would be kept open for perhaps as long as a week with the understanding that all offerings would be taken, and a 2-1/2 per cent bond on a coupon basis which would not be available for bank sub scription. A memorandum of suggestions with respect to the forthcoming fi nancing, prepared by Mr. Piser under date of September 28, 1942, was read. Mr. Sproul stated that in his opinion the Treasury financing dur ing October should include, (1) an increase in the weekly offering of bills to $450,000,000 on October 21, (2) an issue of $4,000,000,000 to include a 2-1/4 per cent bond and a 1-5/8 per cent note or a 1-3/4 per cent fixed-maturity bond, this offering not to specify the amount of each issue so that allotments would be in proportion to the total amount of subscriptions received, to be kept open four or five days, and to have dates in order to avoid unnecessary movements of funds into split payment and out of Treasury accounts, and (3) an offering of one-year certificates of indebtedness late in the month to refund the $1,500,000,000 of certif icates maturing on November 1, and perhaps to obtain $500,000,000 in cash. 2 per cent and 2-1/4 per cent bond, Mr. Sproul expressed the As between a view that a 2-1/4 per cent bond combined with a long note, or a short bond,
would not only be the best market combination but that, of equal impor tance, it would provide a security which would attract the funds of banks outside the money centers which we want to get into use and the funds of some nonbank investors who, for one reason or another, do not wish to buy registered securities such as the 2-1/2 per cent bonds of 1962-67, Reasons for the programs suggested by Messrs. Eccles and Sproul were discussed, and Mr. McKee suggested that consideration might also be given to a 5-1/2-year obligation which would not be called a bond. Mr. Szymczak raised the question whether a third possible issue might be in the form of a 5-year note. Following comments by the Presidents with respect to the types of issue that would appear to be preferred in the respective Federal Reserve districts, Chairman Eccles summarized the discussion in substantially the following statement: There would seem to be no disagreement on the part of the representatives of the Federal Reserve System if the Treasury should decide to put out a 1-5/8 per cent 5-year note. The disagreement is primarily on the point whether a 2 or a 2-1/4 per cent market issue should be offered. Some of the members of the Federal Open Market Com mittee and Presidents feel that securities designed for banks should not have a maturity beyond 10 years, while others feel that there is no ob jection to exceeding that period to provide an investment for the smaller banks with relatively large amounts of time or savings deposits. A major ity opinion would favor providing for banks with savings deposits a 2-1/2 per cent security in some form, such as the Series G bonds or the 62-67s, up to some stated amount not to exceed the amount of a bank' savings
deposits. There seems to be little support for opening up the 62-67s be fore November since it is believed that funds of that type have not had time since the last offering to accumulate in sufficient amounts to as sure another successful offering, and the preference would be for a 1-5/8 per cent note. If the 62-67s were reopened, the majority opinion was that the issue might well be changed to a coupon bond for the purpose of in creasing the demand. The meeting then recessed to permit the members of the executive committee to attend the conference on Treasury financing at the Treasury, and reconvened at 12:20 p.m. with the same attendance as at the earlier session except that Messrs. Goldenweiser and Rouse were not present and Mr. Thurston, Special Assistant to the Chairman of the Board of Governors, was in attendance. Chairman Eccles reviewed briefly the discussions at the meeting stating that the members of the executive committee had at the Treasury, respective views, that it developed during the discussion stated their that members of the Treasury staff had recommended a 2 per cent bond and for the October financing, but that no decisions had a 1 per cent note been reached. It was agreed, he said, that members of the Treasury staff would meet with Washington members of the Federal Open Market Committee for a further discussion tomorrow and that the members of the executive a.m. for another on Friday at 11:00 go to the Treasury committee would with the Secretary of the Treasury. meeting stated that, if it should report, Chairman Eccles Following his authority to issue a was without legal determined that the Treasury be
stated amount of bills each week at a fixed rate in addition to the regular offering, he would request the Federal Open Market Committee at its next meeting to consider and act on the suggestion that bills held in the System account be made available at a rate of 3/8 per cent to anyone desiring to purchase them. Mr. McKee suggested that, as a means of making available to the members of the executive committee of the Federal Open Market Committee, in connection with discussions of Treasury financing, information and views on that subject from the various Federal Reserve districts, the Presidents designate alternates to participate in such discussions in the absence of the Presidents, and that, if that were not feasible, arrangements be made to request the comments and suggestions of the Presidents to reach the mem bers of the executive committee prior to such discussions. It was agreed that it might not be feasible to have representatives of all of the Banks present at the discussions of the members of the executive committee on but that arrangements might be made to have letter or Treasury financing, wire advice from the Banks whenever time permitted. Thereupon the meeting adjourned. Secretary. Approved: Chairman.
What changed from the previous meeting’s minutes
- The executive committee's authority limit was increased to $1,000,000,000, including special short-term certificates.
- A resolution was adopted to discontinue bill purchases at rates below 3/8 percent, with exceptions authorized by the executive committee.
- The committee approved a repurchase arrangement for Treasury bills sold at 3/8 percent, allowing sellers to repurchase before maturity.
- The committee agreed to defer any increase in the bill rate to 1/2 percent until reserve requirements of central reserve city banks were reduced to 20 percent.
- A proposal to reduce the general discount rate to 3/8 percent was withdrawn after discussion, favoring a repurchase arrangement instead.
- The executive committee was directed to discuss with the Treasury a plan for direct bill purchases, not to be implemented until after August financing.
Summary generated automatically from the two documents.
Also: Record of Policy Actions·Minutes of the Executive Committee, August 18, 1942·Minutes of the Executive Committee, September 28, 1942